<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Cervenka Consulting Forums — bond in Reinforcement bars]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forums.cervenka.cz:80/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=1631&amp;type=atom" />
	<updated>2013-05-02T09:08:34Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?id=1631</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: bond in Reinforcement bars]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=2881#p2881" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>The problem with connecting bar ends is that in fact, this is done by connecting both bars to the same neighbouring nodes of volume elements. We agree a connection of 2 bars with contiuous bond slip would be useful, but so far we were not able to find a good way of implementing it. </p><p>If you are scared by editing text files, we can help you optimize the mesh such that the opening does not introdcue so many additional elements.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[dpryl]]></name>
				<uri>https://forums.cervenka.cz/profile.php?id=4</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2013-05-02T09:08:34Z</updated>
			<id>https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=2881#p2881</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: bond in Reinforcement bars]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=2880#p2880" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>And what about my proposal of connecting two bar ends ? The simplest way is really a manual edit of the input files? Your first proposal (the opening) seems a bit expensive to realize. In fact, starting with around 3000 elements with only this little change the number of elements passed 6 thousand.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[francisco]]></name>
				<uri>https://forums.cervenka.cz/profile.php?id=13279</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2013-04-30T17:37:13Z</updated>
			<id>https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=2880#p2880</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: bond in Reinforcement bars]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=2879#p2879" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Dear Francisco, <br />there are 2 basic ways of separating a bar from the surrounding volume: </p><p>A. create an opening in the volume such that there is some space between the bar and the concrete. The opening can (and should) be simplified to a square or so, but even then, this way of modelling makes reasonable meshing more work. </p><p>B. restrict the automatically created connections between concrete and bars only to the Macroelements/Volumes the bar is connected to. This can currently be only done by manually modifying the ATENA Input File (.inp).&nbsp; When doing this for the first time, send us your model + the correcponding .inp file and we will help you with the modifications.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[dpryl]]></name>
				<uri>https://forums.cervenka.cz/profile.php?id=4</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2013-04-30T14:29:47Z</updated>
			<id>https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=2879#p2879</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[bond in Reinforcement bars]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=2878#p2878" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p><p>I&#039;d like to model a reinforcement bar with a bonded length in a part, and the rest with a reduced bond (1/10 or something like this, in order to simulate the presence of a PVC sheeting). I&#039;ve modeled this bar with two bars connected in one point, and I&#039;ve set up that point to don&#039;t slip (flag).</p><p>In order to control if this way of modeling is correct, I&#039;ve first assigned the same bond to the two parts of the rebar. I could observe a strange behavior in corrispondence of the connection point between the two rebars. In particular, I can see a concentration of stresses and cracks around that point.</p><p>Is this way of modeling correct? If not, how can I obtain the desired result?</p><p>Thank you for your help,</p><p>Francesco</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[francisco]]></name>
				<uri>https://forums.cervenka.cz/profile.php?id=13279</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2013-04-30T09:39:06Z</updated>
			<id>https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=2878#p2878</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
