<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Cervenka Consulting Forums — Construction cases]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forums.cervenka.cz:80/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=1657&amp;type=atom" />
	<updated>2013-09-20T07:38:22Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?id=1657</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Construction cases]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=2987#p2987" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hello Francisco, </p><p>yes, the best way for this is using variable material. </p><p>Zdenek</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[zjanda]]></name>
				<uri>https://forums.cervenka.cz/profile.php?id=137</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2013-09-20T07:38:22Z</updated>
			<id>https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=2987#p2987</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Construction cases]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=2983#p2983" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hello Dobromyl,</p><p>I&#039;d like to ask you what is the most direct way of modeling a concrete beam that has a strength of 35 MPa during prestressing and 70 MPa after this phase, when a subsequent load will be applied on the same macroelement. Is the variable material the right choice? I&#039;m wondering whether is possible to use two previously defined materials or if it is necessary the use of the variable one.</p><p>Thank you very much.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[francisco]]></name>
				<uri>https://forums.cervenka.cz/profile.php?id=13279</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2013-09-19T11:32:30Z</updated>
			<id>https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=2983#p2983</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
