<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Cervenka Consulting Forums — two constitutive models in the same analysis]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forums.cervenka.cz:80/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=1673&amp;type=atom" />
	<updated>2013-11-11T08:36:27Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?id=1673</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: two constitutive models in the same analysis]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=3026#p3026" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hello, mixing several material models in one analysis is not a problem in ATENA. However, I don&#039;t know what you mean by &quot;Damage model&quot;? For masonry, we generally recommend the fracture-plastic material model (NLCem2), but I can imagine in some cases, Drucker-Prager may work well, too.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[dpryl]]></name>
				<uri>https://forums.cervenka.cz/profile.php?id=4</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2013-11-11T08:36:27Z</updated>
			<id>https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=3026#p3026</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[two constitutive models in the same analysis]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=3025#p3025" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p><p>It&#039;s possible to use two constitutive models in the same analysis ?&nbsp; Fracture-Plasticity model for RC frame and Damage model for Masonry panel. Are there any special precautions ?</p><p>Thanks</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[kikim.toulouse]]></name>
				<uri>https://forums.cervenka.cz/profile.php?id=24693</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2013-11-10T08:37:23Z</updated>
			<id>https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=3025#p3025</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
