<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Cervenka Consulting Forums — two constitutive models in the same analysis]]></title>
		<link>https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?id=1673</link>
		<atom:link href="https://forums.cervenka.cz:80/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=1673&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in two constitutive models in the same analysis.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2013 08:36:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: two constitutive models in the same analysis]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=3026#p3026</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello, mixing several material models in one analysis is not a problem in ATENA. However, I don&#039;t know what you mean by &quot;Damage model&quot;? For masonry, we generally recommend the fracture-plastic material model (NLCem2), but I can imagine in some cases, Drucker-Prager may work well, too.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (dpryl)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2013 08:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=3026#p3026</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[two constitutive models in the same analysis]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=3025#p3025</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p><p>It&#039;s possible to use two constitutive models in the same analysis ?&nbsp; Fracture-Plasticity model for RC frame and Damage model for Masonry panel. Are there any special precautions ?</p><p>Thanks</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (kikim.toulouse)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 10 Nov 2013 08:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=3025#p3025</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
