<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Cervenka Consulting Forums — Newton Raphson vs Arc Length]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forums.cervenka.cz:80/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=1694&amp;type=atom" />
	<updated>2014-02-06T09:15:43Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?id=1694</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Newton Raphson vs Arc Length]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=3075#p3075" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hello, for a basic explanation about N-R and AL, please see ATENA Troubleshooting, 2.2.6.1 Solution methods.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[dpryl]]></name>
				<uri>https://forums.cervenka.cz/profile.php?id=4</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2014-02-06T09:15:43Z</updated>
			<id>https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=3075#p3075</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Newton Raphson vs Arc Length]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=3074#p3074" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hi there,</p><p>I am running a model to find the ultimate capacity of a pile cap with prescribed force. I have run the program with both&nbsp; Newton Raphson and Arc Length, and the results are considerably different. The deflection t pile cap corners and the reinforcement stress are different from two analysis.<br />Can you advise me on which solution method is more reliable.</p><p>kind regards,<br />Siavash</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[siavash.hashemi]]></name>
				<uri>https://forums.cervenka.cz/profile.php?id=24738</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2014-02-06T07:48:03Z</updated>
			<id>https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=3074#p3074</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
