<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Cervenka Consulting Forums — Newton Raphson vs Arc Length]]></title>
		<link>https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?id=1694</link>
		<atom:link href="https://forums.cervenka.cz:80/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=1694&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Newton Raphson vs Arc Length.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2014 09:15:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Newton Raphson vs Arc Length]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=3075#p3075</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello, for a basic explanation about N-R and AL, please see ATENA Troubleshooting, 2.2.6.1 Solution methods.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (dpryl)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2014 09:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=3075#p3075</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Newton Raphson vs Arc Length]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=3074#p3074</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi there,</p><p>I am running a model to find the ultimate capacity of a pile cap with prescribed force. I have run the program with both&nbsp; Newton Raphson and Arc Length, and the results are considerably different. The deflection t pile cap corners and the reinforcement stress are different from two analysis.<br />Can you advise me on which solution method is more reliable.</p><p>kind regards,<br />Siavash</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (siavash.hashemi)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2014 07:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=3074#p3074</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
