<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Cervenka Consulting Forums — Bearing plate material properties]]></title>
		<link>https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?id=1792</link>
		<atom:link href="https://forums.cervenka.cz:80/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=1792&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Bearing plate material properties.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 May 2015 12:10:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Bearing plate material properties]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=3324#p3324</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Dear rabyaneh, <br />I assume you work with ATENA Engineering 3D. </p><p>For general recommendations related to convergence issues, please see ATENA Troubleshooting, 2.1.19 Problems reaching convergence and understanding ATENA convergence parameters, 2.4.2 I get the message &quot;The execution is killed due to violation of stop iteration criteria&quot;, what does it mean?, and 2.4.6 Floating point problems - Division by zero, Loss of &gt;7 digits on the matrix diagonal, Warning: Sign of diagonal changed when reducing equation, Floating point exception: Multiple floating points traps, Zero or negative jacobian,&nbsp; InvertA: zero determinant, CCMaterials Extended AExc: CC5ParamYield F: project_stress_on_f_division by zero, and similar. The current version of the document is available from our web (Products - ATENA - Documentation). </p><p>&quot;No connection&quot; means the 2 neighbouring Macroelements are completely separate - not connected at all through the automatically created contact (in other words, the displacements on the 2 surfaces are completely independent from each other). </p><p>If you wish to use an Interface Material, please first see Troubleshooting, 2.2.14 I have problems when using the Interface (GAP) material on contacts. </p><p>However, I would recommend to follow Troubleshooting, 2.1.11 Unrealistic damage near loading/support plates during shrinkage or pre- or post-tensioning. </p><p>With respect to the strands, you may also like to read Troubleshooting, 2.2.5 How to model bonded post-tensioning cables in ATENA? </p><p>If you can not solve the problems, you can send us your model (see Troubleshooting, 2.1.1).</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (dpryl)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2015 12:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=3324#p3324</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Bearing plate material properties]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=3323#p3323</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Dear sir,</p><p>I am trying to model a prestressed girder at the stage of release. The girder is resting on two base plates that are each restrained along a line on their bottom surfaces. One bearing plate is restrained in all three directions; the other is restrained in all directions except for the direction parallel to the length of the girder (Y). The full length, but only half of the cross-section, of the girder is modeled. Therefore, the plane of symmetry is fully restrained in the X direction.</p><p>[X is along the width of the girder, Z is along the height of the girder and Y is along the length of the girder].</p><p>The contact surface between the girder and the base plate was automatically defined as &quot;partial.&quot; I am having convergence issues that I think may relate to restraint-induced excessive cracking at the base of the girder at the time of release. I was wondering if there is a way to specify a material for the base plate that would only transfer normal stresses and not transverse stresses and would allow the girder to camber up?</p><p>In addition, I tried to changed the contact surface properties to &quot;no-contact&quot; assuming that it would then behave as a compression-only support. I got convergence errors at the very first step relating to &quot;slips&quot; in segment 1 of about 25 of the bars. The bar IDs mentioned in the error do not match the bar ID that I have specified for any of my reinforcement, so I could not identify which bars were causing an issue.</p><p>[I am using a CEB FIB bond model for the prestressed strands that are located at the top and bottom flanges of the girder. Other shear reinforcement are assumed to have perfect bond].</p><p>I would appreciate your input. Many thanks.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (rabyaneh)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2015 20:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=3323#p3323</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
