<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Cervenka Consulting Forums — other failure mechanisms: breaking rebar in ATENA GiD 12.0.7]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forums.cervenka.cz:80/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=1865&amp;type=atom" />
	<updated>2016-07-13T15:08:14Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?id=1865</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: other failure mechanisms: breaking rebar in ATENA GiD 12.0.7]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=3548#p3548" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Dear MHS, <br />1. please first see ATENA Troubleshooting, 2.2.18 My analysis results do not match the experiment/expectations. How can I improve my model? for some basic model improvement ideas. </p><p>2. It is not clear from your question what working diagram have you defined for the rebar steel(s)? An ideal plastic model of course can not represent bar rupture... </p><p>3. If you still can not solve your problem, send us your model etc. following Troubleshooting, 2.1.1.</p><p>Regards.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[dpryl]]></name>
				<uri>https://forums.cervenka.cz/profile.php?id=4</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2016-07-13T15:08:14Z</updated>
			<id>https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=3548#p3548</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[other failure mechanisms: breaking rebar in ATENA GiD 12.0.7]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=3547#p3547" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Dear reader,</p><p>Lately I&#039;ve been working a case with lots of rebar in it. Beam height 1600 mm. Stir ups and bending rebar.</p><p>A simpler calculation by hand shows me that the most likely to happen failure mechanism would be breaking of the bending rebar.</p><p>In a way this is also shown in the ATENA studio output. The Load-deflection diagram shows not normal deflections after the failure load is reached. 1000 mm or something. And also the strains in the rebar are like 5 %.</p><p>So my conclusion would be that the structure has failed. But then again why do I see the load-displacement graph still going up. As if there is more load to carry. Isn&#039;t it supposed to go down like in the simpler tutorial with the shear failure mechanism?</p><p>Is this perhaps caused by the fact that this problem has more rebar ( also in the area which is under compressive stress)?</p><p>What can I do about this?</p><p>Many thanks for considering my request.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[MHS]]></name>
				<uri>https://forums.cervenka.cz/profile.php?id=25152</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2016-07-13T14:50:42Z</updated>
			<id>https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=3547#p3547</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
