Re: Boundary condition for a 4 point test

null@example.com (dpryl) — Mon, 14 Nov 2016 09:10:33 +0000

Dear karim.attia.1,
if you wish advice on modelling your boundary conditions, please send us sketches/photos explaining the real setup (see also Troubleshooting, 2.1.1).

Just guessing: We recommend setting the Conditional Break Criteria such that the analysis stops when the errors are large at the end of a step, see also Troubleshooting, 2.4.2.1 Recommended settings.

Boundary condition for a 4 point test

null@example.com (karim.attia.1) — Sat, 12 Nov 2016 17:53:26 +0000

Hello,
I'm modelling a 4-point test. For me, It's important to model the full beam in order to compare between the cracks from the experiments and from the model.
The thing is, I don't know what boundary conditions should be applied.
Since I've to supports, I modelled one with constrains in x,y,z " to resemble a hinge support" and the other with constraints in y,z " to resemble a roller support". I put the constraints in the y direction in order to prevent in deflections in the out of plane.
From the model results, I see that the supports at the two reactions seems reasonable and the curves are coincide, but after a specific time the curves tend to diverge from each other and the results are completely un realistic.

What do you think about this modelling?
Thanks.

Cervenka Consulting Forums — Boundary condition for a 4 point test

Re: Boundary condition for a 4 point test

Boundary condition for a 4 point test