<![CDATA[Cervenka Consulting Forums — post-cracking stiffness of beams]]>2018-03-16T06:50:58ZPunBBhttps://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?id=2000<![CDATA[Re: post-cracking stiffness of beams]]>Yes Sir. I sent you my models. Please check email. Thank you.]]>https://forums.cervenka.cz/profile.php?id=252962018-03-16T06:50:58Zhttps://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=3926#p3926<![CDATA[Re: post-cracking stiffness of beams]]>Dear Bikip, please follow ATENA Troubleshooting, 2.1.1 to send us your model, sketches of what you are modelling, and a comparison with the measurements.
Regards.
]]>https://forums.cervenka.cz/profile.php?id=42018-03-15T18:10:15Zhttps://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=3925#p3925<![CDATA[post-cracking stiffness of beams]]>Dear Sir, I am modelling the shear behavior of beams reinforced GFRP without stirrups in ATENA 2D. The published data adapted from several reseachers. I see that in generally, post-cracking stiffness of beams falls below this from data. In addition, deflection at mid-span is always much higher than that obtained from data (double value!). So, how to deal with this problem? and are there parameters to adjust it? Thank you so much!]]>https://forums.cervenka.cz/profile.php?id=252962018-03-15T15:47:04Zhttps://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=3924#p3924