<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Cervenka Consulting Forums — Negative crack width]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forums.cervenka.cz:80/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=2040&amp;type=atom" />
	<updated>2018-10-22T17:30:43Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?id=2040</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Negative crack width]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=4040#p4040" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Thanks a lot for your explanations</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[arjun.vithalkar]]></name>
				<uri>https://forums.cervenka.cz/profile.php?id=25444</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2018-10-22T17:30:43Z</updated>
			<id>https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=4040#p4040</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Negative crack width]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=4039#p4039" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Dear arjun.vithalkar, <br />yes. For your second question, I am not sure if I understand, but the most typical setting is to make the interface thickness equal to to the smaller thickness of the 2 MEs being connected with it. </p><p>Regards.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[dpryl]]></name>
				<uri>https://forums.cervenka.cz/profile.php?id=4</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2018-10-22T11:37:40Z</updated>
			<id>https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=4039#p4039</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Negative crack width]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=4038#p4038" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>So, does that mean, if the thickness of interface is smaller than the adjacent macroelement (say interface th. = 100mm and macroelement th. = 400mm), it denotes that only a small percentage of the two macroelement layers are connected to each other (in this case only 25%) ?</p><p>If yes, then what should be the optimum percentage of interface thickness in relation with the adjacent macroelement thickness?</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[arjun.vithalkar]]></name>
				<uri>https://forums.cervenka.cz/profile.php?id=25444</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2018-10-22T10:36:48Z</updated>
			<id>https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=4038#p4038</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Negative crack width]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=4037#p4037" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Dear arjun.vithalkar, <br />the Thickness in the 2D Interface is the same as in all other 2D material models/Macroelements, i.e., the dimension in the 3rd direction - perpendicular to the screen. </p><p>Regards.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[dpryl]]></name>
				<uri>https://forums.cervenka.cz/profile.php?id=4</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2018-10-22T08:21:34Z</updated>
			<id>https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=4037#p4037</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Negative crack width]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=4036#p4036" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the clarification. </p><p>I need to ask one more thing about the interface material model.</p><p>-Is the thickness (specified in the connection input of line properties), related to the thickness of interface in y-direction or into the plane of model (along z-axis) (If I&#039;m modelling in 2D ATENA and x-axis is my longitudinal axis)? </p><p>I ask this because, if I&#039;m not wrong, while defining the macroelements, the thickness refers to the width of the specimen (that is thickness into the plane of model, i.e, along z-axis), as dimensions for the macroelements are assigned separately while defining the number of joints. </p><p>Therefore, these two values of thicknesses should be always different, because interface thickness will be very less as compared to width of adjacent macroelement.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[arjun.vithalkar]]></name>
				<uri>https://forums.cervenka.cz/profile.php?id=25444</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2018-10-21T16:06:37Z</updated>
			<id>https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=4036#p4036</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Negative crack width]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=4033#p4033" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Dear arjun.vithalkar, <br />closed cracks can have negative opening, because the numerical stiffness acting against overlapping while closing can not be infinite. <br />Regards.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[dpryl]]></name>
				<uri>https://forums.cervenka.cz/profile.php?id=4</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2018-10-17T15:34:28Z</updated>
			<id>https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=4033#p4033</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Negative crack width]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=4032#p4032" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>While analyzing the crack behavior, I am getting negative crack width values for cod1 of my specimen. <br />What does this negative crack width mean ? Does it have any physical significance?</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[arjun.vithalkar]]></name>
				<uri>https://forums.cervenka.cz/profile.php?id=25444</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2018-10-17T15:08:42Z</updated>
			<id>https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=4032#p4032</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
