<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Cervenka Consulting Forums — CEB-FIP Bond-Slip Model Implementation]]></title>
		<link>https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?id=2061</link>
		<atom:link href="https://forums.cervenka.cz:80/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=2061&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in CEB-FIP Bond-Slip Model Implementation.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2019 13:55:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: CEB-FIP Bond-Slip Model Implementation]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=4102#p4102</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Dear Valentina, <br />this sounds like some linear design formula / code recommended construction guideline, probably to account for some minimum anchorage length? <br />If so, it probably does not make much sense within nonlinear FEM analysis... </p><p>When the bond law is considered along a bar, the slips are calculated and the load transfer can be reproduced, including the anchoring regions. Therefore, there is no need to consider such a formula in your ATENA model (however, on the other hand, you can make a parametric study with ATENA to verify if/under what conditions this formula is a good design guideline...).</p><p>If the background behind the lambda is something different, please refer to the exact code and page (copy-paste if possible), such that we can look at its meaning and possible influence in nonlinear FEM. </p><p>Regards.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (dpryl)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2019 13:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=4102#p4102</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[CEB-FIP Bond-Slip Model Implementation]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=4099#p4099</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Dear Sir,</p><p>Does the ATENA implementation of the CEB-FIP bond-slip model consider the reduction parameter (lambda) given by the code?<br />(lambda: reduction parameter for those parts of the reinforcement that are a distance x&lt;=5 times the rebar diameter).</p><p>Thanks for the answer,</p><p>Kind regards, </p><p>Valentina</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (vvr)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2019 00:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=4099#p4099</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
