<![CDATA[Cervenka Consulting Forums — Smear or embedded reinforcement]]> https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?id=2062 Fri, 11 Jan 2019 13:45:40 +0000 PunBB <![CDATA[Re: Smear or embedded reinforcement]]> https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=4101#p4101 Dear RicardoBustamante, the choice which way is the best to model reinforcement strongly depends not only on the geometry and the reinforcement properties, but also the loading and the purpose of the analysis. If you send us your model etc. following Troubleshooting, 2.1.1, we should be able to help you decide.

Regards.

]]> Fri, 11 Jan 2019 13:45:40 +0000 https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=4101#p4101 <![CDATA[Smear or embedded reinforcement]]> https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=4100#p4100 hi
I am modeling a dynamic problem with nonlinear behavior of the concrete using the CCnonlinCementitious2 material and tetrahedral elements. Over the reinforcement bars, do you have any recommendations on what to use, smear or embedded reinforcement bars perfectly bonded to the concrete?
Thanks
Regards
RB

]]> Fri, 11 Jan 2019 05:22:21 +0000 https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=4100#p4100