<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Cervenka Consulting Forums — Convergence of SBeta material vs Cementitious material]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forums.cervenka.cz:80/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=2111&amp;type=atom" />
	<updated>2019-07-01T14:16:30Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?id=2111</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Convergence of SBeta material vs Cementitious material]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=4305#p4305" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Dear brianbrongers,<br />1. if you seek help with your particular models, please send us both models along with sketches/photos + description illustrating what you are modelling (Troubleshooting, 2.1.1). </p><p>2. Just guessing: as you are comparing the results directly to average measurements, you should work with mean material properties. </p><p>Regards.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[dpryl]]></name>
				<uri>https://forums.cervenka.cz/profile.php?id=4</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2019-07-01T14:16:30Z</updated>
			<id>https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=4305#p4305</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Convergence of SBeta material vs Cementitious material]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=4304#p4304" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Greetings,</p><p>I&#039;m running into some convergence issues. I had previously made 2D (deep)beam models using the SBeta material model, no issues there, however my professor suggested running the same model with the 3D non linear cementitious 2 material model. However, as soon as the model goes past the linear elastic load it seems to be unable to reach convergence. I&#039;ve tried the various suggestions given in troubleshooting 2.1.19, severely reducing step size, changing to the modified Newton-Raphson method, none of which seem to help the model reach convergence. It feels like I&#039;m missing something but I cannot seem to figure out what. </p><p>I know from experiments the failure loads for the normal beams(h=300), which isn&#039;t reached yet at the linear elastic loads, so I don&#039;t think this is structural collapse. For the deep beams(h=1200) the linear elastic load from Atena is higher than the failure load obtained in the experiments, so this might be structural collapse. </p><p>I would like to hear your suggestions on how to handle this.</p><p>Edit: seems like I misinterpreted the modified Newton-Raphson solution to convergence issues. I was using this for all load steps rather than just the problematic steps. I&#039;ll do some more testing with this.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[brianbrongers]]></name>
				<uri>https://forums.cervenka.cz/profile.php?id=25571</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2019-07-01T09:57:56Z</updated>
			<id>https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=4304#p4304</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
