<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Cervenka Consulting Forums — Convergence of SBeta material vs Cementitious material]]></title>
		<link>https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?id=2111</link>
		<atom:link href="https://forums.cervenka.cz:80/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=2111&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Convergence of SBeta material vs Cementitious material.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2019 14:16:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Convergence of SBeta material vs Cementitious material]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=4305#p4305</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Dear brianbrongers,<br />1. if you seek help with your particular models, please send us both models along with sketches/photos + description illustrating what you are modelling (Troubleshooting, 2.1.1). </p><p>2. Just guessing: as you are comparing the results directly to average measurements, you should work with mean material properties. </p><p>Regards.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (dpryl)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2019 14:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=4305#p4305</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Convergence of SBeta material vs Cementitious material]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=4304#p4304</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Greetings,</p><p>I&#039;m running into some convergence issues. I had previously made 2D (deep)beam models using the SBeta material model, no issues there, however my professor suggested running the same model with the 3D non linear cementitious 2 material model. However, as soon as the model goes past the linear elastic load it seems to be unable to reach convergence. I&#039;ve tried the various suggestions given in troubleshooting 2.1.19, severely reducing step size, changing to the modified Newton-Raphson method, none of which seem to help the model reach convergence. It feels like I&#039;m missing something but I cannot seem to figure out what. </p><p>I know from experiments the failure loads for the normal beams(h=300), which isn&#039;t reached yet at the linear elastic loads, so I don&#039;t think this is structural collapse. For the deep beams(h=1200) the linear elastic load from Atena is higher than the failure load obtained in the experiments, so this might be structural collapse. </p><p>I would like to hear your suggestions on how to handle this.</p><p>Edit: seems like I misinterpreted the modified Newton-Raphson solution to convergence issues. I was using this for all load steps rather than just the problematic steps. I&#039;ll do some more testing with this.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (brianbrongers)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2019 09:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=4304#p4304</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
