<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Cervenka Consulting Forums — modeling reinforced concrete shear wall]]></title>
		<link>https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?id=2420</link>
		<atom:link href="https://forums.cervenka.cz:80/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=2420&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in modeling reinforced concrete shear wall.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2025 09:25:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[modeling reinforced concrete shear wall]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=5230#p5230</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello everyone,</p><p>For my Master’s thesis, I am modeling a simple reinforced concrete shear wall from an experimentally tested specimen presented in a paper, in order to obtain the shear wall’s load carrying capacity. I am first performing validation, but I’m facing some issues and I have a few questions:</p><p>1. My results under monotonic loading show some differences. How can I improve them? </p><p>2. The paper does not provide the load protocol, although the specimen was also tested under cyclic loading. I also want to run the model under cyclic loading, but in GiD I don’t know how to define the cyclic loading to match the paper’s results.</p><p>3. Another issue in validating a beam is that my model’s stiffness is too high and differs from the experimental results. How can I improve it so that my results match the experimental data?</p><p>Thank you in advance for your guidance.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Amirhossein)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2025 09:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=5230#p5230</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
