<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Cervenka Consulting Forums — Concrete Temperature Dependent material properties]]></title>
		<link>https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?id=342</link>
		<atom:link href="https://forums.cervenka.cz:80/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=342&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Concrete Temperature Dependent material properties.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 08:12:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Concrete Temperature Dependent material properties]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=875#p875</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Dear Ruben,</p><p>I am sorry for late reply. It is difficult to say, which temperature dependent parameters play most important role in increase<br />in the time calculation. However, here are some general remarks:</p><p>- it is better to define the temperature dependency functions such that no parameter drops totally to zero.<br />&nbsp; Generally I recommend to not to let the parameters drop below 1% of the original value (i.e. 0.01)</p><p>- It is mainly important to have a temperature dependance of fc, ft and E, eps_cp, and of course eps_t,<br />&nbsp; but the others can be left constant.</p><p>- It is important to use the total formulation with cca 20 steps</p><p>- It is also recommended to use the initial stiffness approach, i.e. elastic stiffness and calculation each step.</p><p>I hope my answers help and again sorry for late reply.</p><p>With best regards</p><p>Jan Cervenka</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (JanCervenka)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 08:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=875#p875</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Concrete Temperature Dependent material properties]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=842#p842</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I have noticed that including temperature dependent concrete material properties is the main driver for increased calculation time when doing a fire analysis.<br />Including only temperature dependency for the reinforcement results in only a minimal increase of calculation time.<br />(I have done these experiments mainly with the predefined material properties)</p><p>I wish to balance a good calculation speed with an acceptable modelling of the temperature dependent properties (so I can quickly see some preliminary results and I can update the model without having to wait a day or more).<br />Do you know which temperature dependencies for the concrete material are the main drivers of the increased calculation time?<br />Have you got any suggestions about how I can increase the calculation time, while including a (simplified) temperature dependent concrete model?</p><p>Best regards,<br />Ruben</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (ruben.vancoile)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 22:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=842#p842</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
