<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Cervenka Consulting Forums — Stone Arch Bridge Numerical Analysis]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forums.cervenka.cz:80/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=363&amp;type=atom" />
	<updated>2012-02-02T09:51:01Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?id=363</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Stone Arch Bridge Numerical Analysis]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=910#p910" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hello!</p><p>The question i&#039;d made was because i&#039;m trying to do a <strong>discrete modelation</strong> of the masonry arch bridge, and I&#039;ve not still choosen the numerical software! <br />Maybe even do the analysis with smeared material...</p><br /><p>Thank you for promptly.<br />Regards<br />NM</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Tapaorelhas]]></name>
				<uri>https://forums.cervenka.cz/profile.php?id=2533</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2012-02-02T09:51:01Z</updated>
			<id>https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=910#p910</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Stone Arch Bridge Numerical Analysis]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=909#p909" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hello, in most cases, masonry is well enough modelled by a smeared material (bulk properties of bricks or stones + mortar, calibrated on a small region with a few bricks/stones). Is there anything specific why you can not use this approach? </p><p>I think modelling a whole bridge with the real geometry of all stones would need so many elements that it does not make sense. Randomization using SARA + random fields is also not ideal for this case because of neglecting the directionality of mortar regions. Therefore, I recommend to first model a representative volume under 2-3 typical situations (compression, bending, shear) and use the results to define a smeared material to be applied to the full bridge model.&nbsp; </p><p>Regards,</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[dpryl]]></name>
				<uri>https://forums.cervenka.cz/profile.php?id=4</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2012-02-02T09:15:21Z</updated>
			<id>https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=909#p909</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Stone Arch Bridge Numerical Analysis]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=908#p908" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hello!</p><br /><p>I use, and like, to work in ATENA 3D to simulate RC structures critical zones...</p><p>Now i need to simulate a masonry stone arch bridge! And my doubt is: it is possible to generate irregular macroelements to simulate the stones, working in 3D?<br />The most relevant problem here is the irregular shape of stones! <br />If you can give me some tips about&nbsp; <strong>masonry stone</strong> arch bridges modelation in ATENA 3D, I&#039;ll appreciate.</p><p>Thanks a lot.<br />Regards<br />NM</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Tapaorelhas]]></name>
				<uri>https://forums.cervenka.cz/profile.php?id=2533</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2012-02-01T16:31:30Z</updated>
			<id>https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=908#p908</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
