<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Cervenka Consulting Forums — Stone Arch Bridge Numerical Analysis]]></title>
		<link>https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?id=363</link>
		<atom:link href="https://forums.cervenka.cz:80/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=363&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Stone Arch Bridge Numerical Analysis.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 09:51:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Stone Arch Bridge Numerical Analysis]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=910#p910</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello!</p><p>The question i&#039;d made was because i&#039;m trying to do a <strong>discrete modelation</strong> of the masonry arch bridge, and I&#039;ve not still choosen the numerical software! <br />Maybe even do the analysis with smeared material...</p><br /><p>Thank you for promptly.<br />Regards<br />NM</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Tapaorelhas)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 09:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=910#p910</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Stone Arch Bridge Numerical Analysis]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=909#p909</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello, in most cases, masonry is well enough modelled by a smeared material (bulk properties of bricks or stones + mortar, calibrated on a small region with a few bricks/stones). Is there anything specific why you can not use this approach? </p><p>I think modelling a whole bridge with the real geometry of all stones would need so many elements that it does not make sense. Randomization using SARA + random fields is also not ideal for this case because of neglecting the directionality of mortar regions. Therefore, I recommend to first model a representative volume under 2-3 typical situations (compression, bending, shear) and use the results to define a smeared material to be applied to the full bridge model.&nbsp; </p><p>Regards,</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (dpryl)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 09:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=909#p909</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Stone Arch Bridge Numerical Analysis]]></title>
			<link>https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=908#p908</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello!</p><br /><p>I use, and like, to work in ATENA 3D to simulate RC structures critical zones...</p><p>Now i need to simulate a masonry stone arch bridge! And my doubt is: it is possible to generate irregular macroelements to simulate the stones, working in 3D?<br />The most relevant problem here is the irregular shape of stones! <br />If you can give me some tips about&nbsp; <strong>masonry stone</strong> arch bridges modelation in ATENA 3D, I&#039;ll appreciate.</p><p>Thanks a lot.<br />Regards<br />NM</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Tapaorelhas)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 16:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forums.cervenka.cz/viewtopic.php?pid=908#p908</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
