You are not logged in. Please login or register.

Forum updated

We have recently updated our forums system, and we have cleared all spam topics and users. In case we accidentally deleted your account, please register again. If you miss a topic you have posted before, please let us know.

Post new reply

Post new reply

Compose and post your new reply

You may use: BBCode Smilies

All fields with bold label must be completed before the form is submitted.

Required information for guests

Required information

Topic review (newest first)


Dear rdevine,
1. we generally recommend to use 5-10 load steps even for loads not expected to get close to peak load, as local nonlinearities, both geometrical and material, can already be important.

2. Please always check the convergence errors - see Troubleshooting, 2.1.19 Problems reaching convergence and understanding ATENA convergence parameters and 2.4.2 I get the message "The execution is killed due to violation of stop iteration criteria", what does it mean?

3. If you seek comments/advice with respect to a particular model, please follow Troubleshooting, 2.1.1 to send us the model etc.



Of note, it does seem that there is some convergence to a solution when 100-200 steps are used. My concern is why the 1 step application of the prestressing force is causing cracking, when these smaller steps do not.



I am trying to model behavior of low rise wall specimens, and I am incorporating a clamping load using an external cable element to model the clamping that was required to attach the loading actuator to the specimen.

I have noticed, that when applying this prestressing load, the results after prestressing vary significantly dependent on how many steps over which I apply the load. Applied in one step, the cracking due to prestressing matched the observed behavior well, but if I apply the prestressing load over 100-200 steps, the prestressing load that results in cracking significantly increases.

Is there something in the external cable model that is step dependent as I am seeing? Nothing else is changed between the models, and I have confirmed that the same total cable load is achieved by the end of the model.