You are not logged in. Please login or register.

Forum updated

We have recently updated our forums system, and we have cleared all spam topics and users. In case we accidentally deleted your account, please register again. If you miss a topic you have posted before, please let us know.

Post new reply

Post new reply

Compose and post your new reply

You may use: BBCode Smilies

All fields with bold label must be completed before the form is submitted.

Required information for guests


Required information

Topic review (newest first)

3

I expect a slower transfer rate when writing to disk, especially in the same time.

I want only to use two different models, so there should not be a problem with the interferences.

Thank you,

2

Dear daescuc, typically, the main memory is critical (size and access speed) to be able to run 2 or more analyses at once without a noticeable slowdown. First of all, make sure there is enough physical RAM memory for both/all analyses (if swapping starts, it can easily slow down the program 100x or 1000x). Second, the memory tranfer rate can be limiting (especially if there are empty memory slots or a mix of modules of differing speeds such that dual or triple channel memory controller can not work efficiently).

With ATENA 3D and large models, storing results to disk can also become a bottleneck easily. Consider only storing every 5th or 10th step to reduce the file size and therefore also the file writing time.

With respect to possible interferences of multiple ATENA instances, there shouldn't be any as long as you do not open the same model file multiple times.

1

Hello,

I need Just an opinion.

I have a quad-core computer, which theoretically will allow me to run multiple instances of the Atena3D program.

In your opinion, do you think that I could run two models in parallel, without having problems with the program computation method (any interferences between the two models or some stability issues)?

Thank you,