From section 2.5., but there is an great infulence of interface stiffness on convergence in my case study. I think i have found best solution fo me.
Thank you!
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Cervenka Consulting Forums → ATENA → Interface concrete / masonry → Post new reply
All fields with bold label must be completed before the form is submitted.
From section 2.5., but there is an great infulence of interface stiffness on convergence in my case study. I think i have found best solution fo me.
Thank you!
First of all, only consider to define any interface (GAP) material, if you know/expect that the interface should be the weakest link (at least in one direction). Otherwise, when properly meshed, the failure is often well captured by damage of the elements of the weaker material.
If you are not sure, first run an analysis without GAP elements (i.e., Perfect connection) and when the results are not good enough, add the interface material.
It is not clear from your question if you are following the recommendations for the initial and residual stiffness values from section 2.6 Interface Material Model of the ATENA Theory Manual?
How can i predict normal and tangential stiffness parameters, since i have problem with numerical stability?
Thank you!
Cervenka Consulting Forums → ATENA → Interface concrete / masonry → Post new reply
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.