Back to company website

You are not logged in. Please login or register.

Forum updated

We have recently updated our forums system, and we have cleared all spam topics and users. In case we accidentally deleted your account, please register again. If you miss a topic you have posted before, please let us know.

Post new reply

Post new reply

Compose and post your new reply

You may use: BBCode Smilies

All fields with bold label must be completed before the form is submitted.

Required information for guests


Required information

Topic review (newest first)

2 Post by dpryl

Dear rabyaneh,
I assume you work with ATENA Engineering 3D.

For general recommendations related to convergence issues, please see ATENA Troubleshooting, 2.1.19 Problems reaching convergence and understanding ATENA convergence parameters, 2.4.2 I get the message "The execution is killed due to violation of stop iteration criteria", what does it mean?, and 2.4.6 Floating point problems - Division by zero, Loss of >7 digits on the matrix diagonal, Warning: Sign of diagonal changed when reducing equation, Floating point exception: Multiple floating points traps, Zero or negative jacobian,  InvertA: zero determinant, CCMaterials Extended AExc: CC5ParamYield F: project_stress_on_f_division by zero, and similar. The current version of the document is available from our web (Products - ATENA - Documentation).

"No connection" means the 2 neighbouring Macroelements are completely separate - not connected at all through the automatically created contact (in other words, the displacements on the 2 surfaces are completely independent from each other).

If you wish to use an Interface Material, please first see Troubleshooting, 2.2.14 I have problems when using the Interface (GAP) material on contacts.

However, I would recommend to follow Troubleshooting, 2.1.11 Unrealistic damage near loading/support plates during shrinkage or pre- or post-tensioning.

With respect to the strands, you may also like to read Troubleshooting, 2.2.5 How to model bonded post-tensioning cables in ATENA?

If you can not solve the problems, you can send us your model (see Troubleshooting, 2.1.1).

1 Post by rabyaneh

Dear sir,

I am trying to model a prestressed girder at the stage of release. The girder is resting on two base plates that are each restrained along a line on their bottom surfaces. One bearing plate is restrained in all three directions; the other is restrained in all directions except for the direction parallel to the length of the girder (Y). The full length, but only half of the cross-section, of the girder is modeled. Therefore, the plane of symmetry is fully restrained in the X direction.

[X is along the width of the girder, Z is along the height of the girder and Y is along the length of the girder].

The contact surface between the girder and the base plate was automatically defined as "partial." I am having convergence issues that I think may relate to restraint-induced excessive cracking at the base of the girder at the time of release. I was wondering if there is a way to specify a material for the base plate that would only transfer normal stresses and not transverse stresses and would allow the girder to camber up?

In addition, I tried to changed the contact surface properties to "no-contact" assuming that it would then behave as a compression-only support. I got convergence errors at the very first step relating to "slips" in segment 1 of about 25 of the bars. The bar IDs mentioned in the error do not match the bar ID that I have specified for any of my reinforcement, so I could not identify which bars were causing an issue.

[I am using a CEB FIB bond model for the prestressed strands that are located at the top and bottom flanges of the girder. Other shear reinforcement are assumed to have perfect bond].

I would appreciate your input. Many thanks.