Dear samuelhanna93, when you seek advice regarding your model, please follow ATENA Troubleshooting, 2.1.1 to send us the model etc. Without that, it is not likely we can guess what is wrong.
Regards.
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Forum updated
We have recently updated our forums system, and we have cleared all spam topics and users. In case we accidentally deleted your account, please register again. If you miss a topic you have posted before, please let us know.
Post new reply
Cervenka Consulting Forums → ATENA → Prestressed concrete beam → Post new reply
Compose and post your new reply
All fields with bold label must be completed before the form is submitted.
Topic review (newest first)
Dear Sir
I have modeled 3D concrete beam with and without pre-stressing force and i want to make comparison between them and study the effect of the pre-stressing force.i made 3 load cases Lc1-force at mid span,LC2-supports, Lc3-pre-stressing when i made analysis steps 1st step include load cases 1,3 and the following steps include load cases 1,2 upto failure. when i analysed it the following message appear:zero pivot,numerical factorization this is the first problem.
note :i made it as :Example Manual (INTB)
the second problem i try to replace the load cases as follow Lc1: supports, LC2 :pre-stressing, LC3 :force at mid span.1st step include load cases 1,2 and the following steps include load cases 1,3 up to failure. the model was analyzed(what is the difference in the last problem) but the capacity of the beam didn't change at the final step of load case1,3.
Cervenka Consulting Forums → ATENA → Prestressed concrete beam → Post new reply
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.