Back to company website

You are not logged in. Please login or register.

Forum updated

We have recently updated our forums system, and we have cleared all spam topics and users. In case we accidentally deleted your account, please register again. If you miss a topic you have posted before, please let us know.

Post new reply

Cervenka Consulting Forums → ATENA → Evaluate a model → Post new reply

Post new reply

Compose and post your new reply

You may use: BBCode Smilies

All fields with bold label must be completed before the form is submitted.

Required information for guests


Required information

Topic review (newest first)

2 Post by dpryl

Dear wajdi.mefleh,
please see Troubleshooting, 2.2.18 My analysis results do not match the experiment/expectations. How can I improve my model? and 2.2.14 I have problems when using the Interface (GAP) material on contacts.

If you can not find the difference source, you can follow Troubleshooting, 2.1.1 to send us your mdoel etc.

Regards.

1 Post by wajdi.mefleh

good evening

please could I ask for an advise what to do to evaluate a model with the steel concrete composite beam experimental test
I tried to change the concrete strength and the interface material (normal stiffness K NN and tangential stiffnes K tt) ( for the steel concrete contact I put them 7*10^3 MN/m^3 - Friction 0.1)
the elastic region is still short after all the changes .. the plastic moment is always lower than the real test.

any advise please!

Thank you for your concern

Cervenka Consulting Forums → ATENA → Evaluate a model → Post new reply