Back to company website

You are not logged in. Please login or register.

Forum updated

We have recently updated our forums system, and we have cleared all spam topics and users. In case we accidentally deleted your account, please register again. If you miss a topic you have posted before, please let us know.

Post new reply

Post new reply

Compose and post your new reply

You may use: BBCode Smilies

All fields with bold label must be completed before the form is submitted.

Required information for guests


Required information

Topic review (newest first)

2 Post by JanCervenka

Hello, the Performance Index indicate that the internal iterations in the fracture-plastice material model has not fully convergence and some error appears there. It does not necessarily means that the results are wrong, but it indicates problems inside the material model. You can try to use smaller time steps or in the newer version of ATENA activate the internal substepping in the Miscellaneous dialog in Cementitious2 material.

1 Post by HanSolo89

Dear Atena users
One of my students is writing his Diploma Thesis on punching shear and we try to generate a Finite-Element model for some existing data.
This worked pretty well and the results are good. However, at the postprocessing my student found the item “Performance Index”. We do not really know how to interpret this parameter as we, to be honest, never looked at this. In the Atena-Handbooks this parameter is also mentioned just very briefly (and we couldn’t find any additional information about it) but it says it is an error measurement regarding the material model.
We always look for the chosen convergence criteria (0,5-1%) to be fulfilled and check the overall behaviour of our model. As mentioned, our model behaves like expected and we are able to catch the experimental results. However, when we look at the Performance Index, we get pretty high values where large areas are above 0,1 as seen in the uploaded picture:

https://ibb.co/k6w1Dtk

We work with Material "CC3DNonLinCementitious2".

Could you please elaborate what this parameter exactly means and, if it is meaningful how we could improve this?


Any help is appreciated, best regards!