You are not logged in. Please login or register.

Forum updated

We have recently updated our forums system, and we have cleared all spam topics and users. In case we accidentally deleted your account, please register again. If you miss a topic you have posted before, please let us know.

Post new reply

Post new reply

Compose and post your new reply

You may use: BBCode Smilies

All fields with bold label must be completed before the form is submitted.

Required information for guests


Required information

Topic review (newest first)

3

Dear Dr. Pryl,

Thank you very much for the guidance.


Best Regards,
Hamed

2

Dear Hamed,
please see ATENA Troubleshooting, 2.1.19 Problems reaching convergence and understanding ATENA convergence parameters for basic related information. The current version of the document is available from our web (Products - ATENA - Documentation).

Increasing the Step Stop multipliers (or possibly even the tolerances) can make sense in some specific situations, like if you wish to get some rough-only postpeak response. Increasing the tolerances before the peak can very easily lead to wrong results.

Regards.

1

Dear Dr. Pryl,

I hope this message finds you well.

Is it reasonable to increase the error of convergence criteria when increasing the number of iterations or changing the step length doesn't lead to convergence in static analyses? For instance, increasing the error of absolute residual forces to 5% while other criteria remain at their default value.

I've checked boundary conditions, material, mesh size,etc.

Best Regards,
Hamed