You are not logged in. Please login or register.

Forum updated

We have recently updated our forums system, and we have cleared all spam topics and users. In case we accidentally deleted your account, please register again. If you miss a topic you have posted before, please let us know.

Post new reply

Cervenka Consulting Forums → ATENA → query → Post new reply

Post new reply

Compose and post your new reply

You may use: BBCode Smilies

All fields with bold label must be completed before the form is submitted.

Required information for guests


Required information

Topic review (newest first)

2

First of all, have you checked the convergence errors?

If there is a difference between the full N-R (tangent stiffness) and modified N-R (elastic stiffness, update each step), it usually means at least one of these two methods haves convergence problems.
Please see http://www.cervenka.cz/products/atena/k … es-it-mean

In most cases, this is due to some problem in the geometry, boundary conditions (supports, loads, master-slave connections), or in cases of extreme material damage. After checking all former possible problem sources, you may also need to shorten the load steps and/or allow more iterations to let the steps converge.

1

hi sir, i was preparing one model of a gfrp wrapped beam n i found some difficulty........acutualy i was not getting a good graph when i used ' tangent' option in the general tab of solution parameter, but when i used 'elastic' option it gave me a graph which was except-able...........so does make any difference in the result by choose between - tangent & elastic - in the stiffness box.....thanks.

Cervenka Consulting Forums → ATENA → query → Post new reply