You are not logged in. Please login or register.

Forum updated

We have recently updated our forums system, and we have cleared all spam topics and users. In case we accidentally deleted your account, please register again. If you miss a topic you have posted before, please let us know.

Post new reply

Cervenka Consulting Forums → ATENA → TENSILE STRENGTH → Post new reply

Post new reply

Compose and post your new reply

You may use: BBCode Smilies

All fields with bold label must be completed before the form is submitted.

Required information for guests


Required information

Topic review (newest first)

2

In the material definition in ATENA, the uniaxial tensile strength is to be entered (see ATENA Theory, 2.2 Fracture–Plastic Constitutive Model (CC3DCementitious, CC3DNonLinCementitious, CC3DNonLinCementitious2, CC3DNonLinCementitious2User, CC3DNonLinCementitious2Variable, CC3DNonLinCementitious2SHCC, CC3DNonLinCementitious3) for more information). If you have ft from a different type of test (flexural, splitting), please do not forget to convert it to uniaxial.

1

While doing the numerical analysis i m having one doubt regarding the tensile strength of concrete. In the material model for concrete what tensile strength should i provide (i) Split tensile strength, (ii) Direct uniaxial tensile strength (Tests conducted on concrete cylinders), (iii) Flexural tensile strength.

Cervenka Consulting Forums → ATENA → TENSILE STRENGTH → Post new reply